#tenantsperspective

TenantSee Weekly: Work

TenantSee Weekly:  Work

Over the past several years the concept of work has undergone more change than at any point in recent history.  While there’s many narratives, one common discussion centers on changing where and when we work to make work less harmful to our health.  This is exemplified by remote work. 
 
Work can certainly be harmful.  Yet few among us can avoid harm.  Indeed, harm often comes to us in ways we cannot and do not anticipate.  Sometimes what seems good turns out to be bad.  The very world in which we live is full of harmful realities.  I’m not convinced the absence of work brings less harm.  Nor am I convinced the changes we’re seeing now around how and where we work are as good for us as we hope they will be.  I think we’re generally failing to account for a variety of negative consequences that are slowly becoming more apparent.

TenantSee Weekly: Active Listening, the Skilled Negotiator's Secret Weapon

TenantSee Weekly: Active Listening, the Skilled Negotiator's Secret Weapon

Office lease negotiations are complex, involving numerous parties (the principals and their advisors), and covering a wide range of issues, from economic to legal.  The most effective negotiators are those who possess both a deep understanding of the markets, and the ability to actively listen while negotiating. 

TenantSee Weekly: Thinking About Physical Spaces

TenantSee Weekly:  Thinking About Physical Spaces

I suspect most of us are caught off guard by change at scale.  When thinking about the pace of change over the last 15 years, it’s clear we’ve entered a new era, one in which technology is enabling us to rethink EVERYTHING.  Change in how we design and occupy physical space is inevitable.  The skyscraper boom began in the late 1800s and the product playbook in urban core office markets has remained mostly unchanged for decades.  Similarly, the ways in which the office product has been developed and owned, the investment thesis, has been largely unchanged in how it relies on capturing the best occupants in leases that reflect the highest possible pricing and the longest possible term to generate stable net operating income and bankable future value.

TenantSee Weekly: Bottom?

TenantSee Weekly:  Bottom?

Have we hit bottom in the pricing of San Francisco office assets?  Maybe. 
 
The historical measures by which office buildings were valued, a function of capitalized net operating income, doesn’t apply to assets having large vacancy and limited
weighted average lease term (“WALT”).  These assets are trading at a simple cost/sf metric.  Investors take a long-term view of the investment, betting the value for San Francisco office will, ultimately, recover.  They may or may not use debt to finance the acquisition – where there is limited occupancy, they may not be able to secure debt.

TenantSee Weekly: Q2 2023 The Tenant's Perspective

TenantSee Weekly: Q2 2023 The Tenant's Perspective

Occupiers continue to add sublease space to an already saturated market, and to downsize their occupancy requirement at lease expiration.  Market participants, including investors, are now accepting as fact the new ways of using office space will result in less demand for their product.  During the first couple of years of the pandemic, investors, enjoying record high levels of occupancy and strong cash flow, naturally chose to believe in a future narrative that included a rebound to 2019 demand levels.  Their optimistic (if not realistic) outlook had them waking up in 2023 with 7m to 10m square feet of demand and 4% vacancy.  But it’s now clear this is not how things are playing out.