#flexspace

TenantSee Weekly: Thinking About Physical Spaces

TenantSee Weekly:  Thinking About Physical Spaces

I suspect most of us are caught off guard by change at scale.  When thinking about the pace of change over the last 15 years, it’s clear we’ve entered a new era, one in which technology is enabling us to rethink EVERYTHING.  Change in how we design and occupy physical space is inevitable.  The skyscraper boom began in the late 1800s and the product playbook in urban core office markets has remained mostly unchanged for decades.  Similarly, the ways in which the office product has been developed and owned, the investment thesis, has been largely unchanged in how it relies on capturing the best occupants in leases that reflect the highest possible pricing and the longest possible term to generate stable net operating income and bankable future value.

TenantSee Weekly: The Office as Hotel

TenantSee Weekly: The Office as Hotel

I participate in a lot of “conversations” on LinkedIn in which people argue that office buildings should be as flexible as hotels.   I love to explore the possibilities, the idea the office can be something different, something better.  But sometimes these conversations are so detached from reality it makes my head hurt.

TenantSee Weekly: Why Flex is Hard (but Inevitable)

TenantSee Weekly: Why Flex is Hard (but Inevitable)

The “flex” in flexible office solutions is about the occupier’s ability to limit commitment. A one-year lease is more flexible than a two-year lease, so on and so forth. With occupier uncertainty about why, where and when they should provide office solutions for their employees at an all-time high, you’d think landlords would be eager to offer high flex options in order to meet demand where it’s at. However, it’s difficult for landlords to provide the flex product, despite its potential to command premium rents and increase demand. Why? Because it’s expensive to build office space, and it’s difficult to design space that has broad residual appeal to a large swath of occupiers.