Op-Ed, Commercial Real Estate, Bay Area
greg fogg
TenantSee Weekly: Knowing Your When

We see a lot of confusion in the market around when to begin negotiations.  It’s not an insignificant consideration.  In fact, when you begin can make a huge difference in the outcome.  It’s understandable that tenants would not know when to start.  Brokers are not always keen to start at the right time, since compensation is derived by transacting and the closer the tenant is to lease expiration, the faster it will need to transact (and the fewer options it will have).  Good for the broker, bad for the tenant.  This creates a misalignment of interests that discourages thoughtful consultation on the front end – the more time a broker spends on a project, the lower the compensation. 

TenantSee Weekly: Knowing Your When
Op-Ed, Commercial Real Estate, Bay Area
greg fogg
TenantSee Weeky: A Big Decline in Rents, Four ...

Throughout 2020, the prevailing sentiment among investors in the San Francisco office market was one of relative optimism.  After all, despite the fact tenants were prohibited from occupying their buildings, they continued to collect full rent.  The buildings were full, with vacancy hovering around 4%.  Sure, companies weren’t happy about paying for space they couldn’t use, but business was good.  In many cases the tech sector (which makes up most of San Francisco’s office occupancy) was booming due to an even greater reliance on and usage of tech caused by pandemic driven changes in how people were living.  Throughout the course of 2020 there was no reason for San Francisco investors to panic, as few (if any) office occupiers were showing signs of developing long-term hybrid or remote-first strategies.  Most were simply focused on solving for ongoing operations as a temporary reaction to the pandemic.  Yet early indicators did point to a future in which companies would be shedding office space, as some expiring leases were not replaced.  This, coupled with the addition of new supply, caused a big increase in vacancy to nearly 12% by year end.  Despite this large uptick, the brunt of the sluggish demand dynamic was being felt in the sublease markets, where rental economics more accurately reflected the true state of the market.  Despite a total closing of the office market in 2020, average asking rents ended the year off just 6% from the pre-pandemic high.

TenantSee Weeky: A Big Decline in Rents, Four Years in the Making
Bay Area, Commercial Real Estate, Op-Ed
greg fogg
TenantSee Weekly: Modern Workplace Planning: ...

In the years leading up to the pandemic, most medium and small companies defined their office space need based on headcount (current and projected), space programming, and industry/sector norms.  The exercise was mostly formulaic.  The primary differences in the offices of a small, regional law firm compared to those of an AM Law 100 firm would be scale, the cost of finishes, and the quality of the building and views.  It was planning for the same outcome, just at different levels on the cost spectrum.  Companies having a larger portfolio of offices would typically create a “workplace strategy” that included guidelines around programming (e.g., space layout, office size, critical adjacencies, growth factor, finishes, FF&E, etc.).  These guidelines could then be used to inform the real estate process across geography.

TenantSee Weekly: Modern Workplace Planning: Solving for Experience Part I: The Purpose
Bay Area, Commercial Real Estate, Op-Ed
greg fogg
TenantSee Weekly: This, or That?

Negotiations are always about (or should always be about) this or that.  There’s always something else, maybe that something else is nothing (as in sometimes the best thing to do is nothing at all).  Decisions made without proper consideration of all relevant alternative scenarios are decisions made poorly.  As important, in the context of office lease negotiations, the best negotiated outcomes are directly correlated to the extent to which we understand the alternatives of the landlord counterparty.  This is a bit counter intuitive, allow us to explain. 

TenantSee Weekly: This, or That?
Bay Area, Commercial Real Estate, Op-Ed
greg fogg
TenantSee Weekly: I Digress...

A little AI distraction to cheer your day (and relieve us of yet another discussion about workplace). Ever wandered through the streets and felt like you've stepped into the future? With their undeniable presence here in San Francisco, the driverless car is quickly becoming the most prominent representation of AI in our daily lives. If you spend any time in San Francisco neighborhoods, you can’t miss them. The other day, as I chatted with a neighbor, I counted 6 autonomous vehicles casually cruise by our front door within a span of 10 minutes. Intriguing, right? And today, in a twist of irony, I was held up by one. Blocked by a double-parked UPS truck, the driverless car hesitated, unsure about navigating into the lane of oncoming traffic. Of course, all the drivers in the opposing lane weren’t too keen to make space for the driverless car, as one normally would (or at least the more decent among us would) for a human-driven vehicle. Hence, we waited.

TenantSee Weekly: I Digress...

#Office

, ,

TenantSee Weekly: Thinking About Physical Spaces

, ,
TenantSee Weekly: Thinking About Physical Spaces

I suspect most of us are caught off guard by change at scale.  When thinking about the pace of change over the last 15 years, it’s clear we’ve entered a new era, one in which technology is enabling us to rethink EVERYTHING.  Change in how we design and occupy physical space is inevitable.  The skyscraper boom began in the late 1800s and the product playbook in urban core office markets has remained mostly unchanged for decades.  Similarly, the ways in which the office product has been developed and owned, the investment thesis, has been largely unchanged in how it relies on capturing the best occupants in leases that reflect the highest possible pricing and the longest possible term to generate stable net operating income and bankable future value.

, ,

TenantSee Weekly: How to Protect From Landlord Default?

, ,
TenantSee Weekly: How to Protect From Landlord Default?

Office building owners are facing the most challenging environment of the past 50 years due to substantial reductions in demand for space.  The shift in demand is not cyclical; it’s a systemic shift caused by changes in how work is done in the information economy.  In other words, investors can’t count on a swift reversion to the norm.  This dynamic is playing out globally.  There are geographic differences, but the fundamental trend is the same.  The impact on office investors has been swift and brutal, leaving many in a precarious financial position.

, ,

TenantSee Weekly: Underwriting Tax Increases (Before You Lease)

, ,
TenantSee Weekly: Underwriting Tax Increases (Before You Lease)

Over the past decade, may office buildings in San Francisco have been sold, some multiple times. For tenants, these sales translate to material increases in the cost of the lease. Why? Primarily because of taxes.

California has Prop 13, which limits annual increases in real estate taxes to 2%, excepting at the time of a sale or financing of the asset, at which point the tax base is adjusted to market, often causing a big spike in taxes. It’s in these latter scenarios, a sale or financing, when tenants are exposed to potentially large cost increases. This is true because the tax attributable to a sale or financing is passed on to the tenant.

For every $100/sf in increased asset value, the rent increases by $1.50/sf. So if a company leases space in a building that has a tax base value of $400/sf and the building subsequently sells for $800/sf, there is a $6.00/sf/year increase in the lease cost. For a 10,000 sf lease, the added annual cost is $60,000.

, ,

TenantSee Weekly: Mo Data Mo Better

, ,
TenantSee Weekly: Mo Data Mo Better

There’s not a single decision we make that isn’t improved by access to more data. The challenge lies in gaining access to data, in prioritizing which data matters and in drawing appropriate insights from the data. For many years the business of tenant advisory involved an opaque transaction between a broker, whom had access to data, and a customer, whom did not. Given that tenant advisors are mostly paid by the landlord counter party, the connectivity between scope of services and fee is muted. This has resulted in the tenant advisory industry being built largely around 2 services, 1) site selection and 2) negotiation of basic business terms (rental economics). These services are easy to stand up and difficult for the customer to measure. Over the past couple of decades, the model has improved; but, frankly, the level of services provided to the tenant customer (in many cases) remains low. Certainly large corporate occupiers benefit from the best service platforms brokerages have to offer. But for medium and smaller companies (5,000 employees and less) there remains substantial room for improvement. Not surprisingly, technology is beginning to play a key role in changing the quality of services being offered by many brokerage advisory firms.