#flexworkspace

TenantSee Weekly: Why Flex is Hard (but Inevitable)

TenantSee Weekly: Why Flex is Hard (but Inevitable)

The “flex” in flexible office solutions is about the occupier’s ability to limit commitment. A one-year lease is more flexible than a two-year lease, so on and so forth. With occupier uncertainty about why, where and when they should provide office solutions for their employees at an all-time high, you’d think landlords would be eager to offer high flex options in order to meet demand where it’s at. However, it’s difficult for landlords to provide the flex product, despite its potential to command premium rents and increase demand. Why? Because it’s expensive to build office space, and it’s difficult to design space that has broad residual appeal to a large swath of occupiers. 

TenantSee Weekly: 40% Office Availability: Why It's Possible and What It Means for San Francisco

TenantSee Weekly: 40% Office Availability: Why It's Possible and What It Means for San Francisco

40% Availability

The San Francisco office market consists of 86.3M sf. Presently 28% of the market is available for lease, including both direct space and sublease space, for a total of just over 24M sf. We’re on pace to finish the year with available supply of 30%. The trend in demand (downsizing) and the near certainty of continued macro-economic headwinds in 2023 make it likely we’ll add another 3% to 5% to available supply by the end of ‘23, bringing total availability as high as 35%. It’s too early to predict what 2024 will bring (hopefully a hockey stick graph showing increased demand for office space), but I believe it’s quite possible we’ll see available supply at or near 40%.

TenantSee Weekly: The Great Reset

TenantSee Weekly: The Great Reset

Ever consider how odd it is that “great” is the adjective of choice for some of our most challenging times? The Great Depression, The Great Recession, etc. Reflexively, when I think about what’s happening in the office market, the reset that’s playing out all over the world, the first adjective that comes to mind is “great”. Sorry about that.

TenantSee Weekly: Flexing

TenantSee Weekly: Flexing

Over the past couple of decades the long term office lease has become increasingly challenging for occupiers. Demand for space has always been cyclical, rising and falling with the economy, and technology has continued to make it easier for workers to be productive from anywhere. While shared space, or coworking solutions have been around for decades, the scale of the industry expanded rapidly during the period from 2010 to 2020, especially through the Softbank-funded expansion of WeWork. Coworking is a form of flex leasing that is characterized mostly by spaces that are broken into component parts, offering members shared access to services and amenities. The space between coworking and long term direct leasing of separately demised office space is a relatively new place in which a tenant can secure a flexible lease (shorter term of 6 months+) on a fully demised, prebuilt, furnished space which does not include managed services. This is the latest and perhaps most consequential form of flex leasing.

TenantSee Weekly: It's Time to Take Action

TenantSee Weekly: It's Time to Take Action

In 2020 most companies forced their workers to a fully remote posture. In 2021 companies started encouraging their employees back to the office, most with limited success. In 2022 this strained dialogue about return to office has continued. While some have sought to fully address the new realities of the workplace by developing and committing to an approach that both clearly addresses expectations for employees and supports these expectations with modifications to the physical workplace, many have chosen to communicate “soft” messaging about return to office while not making any changes to the physical office.

TenantSee Weekly: Suits, Ties, and the Office

TenantSee Weekly: Suits, Ties, and the Office

I have a lot of suits and ties. The ties are folded neatly in a drawer that I rarely open. Some are solid, some have stripes, some have little animal prints. I also have a lot of suits. These are mostly tucked into the back of my closet. Oh, I have some expensive leather shoes in a variety of styles, as well. These, too, are stored in various states of disuse. I no longer wear this stuff (but for rare exceptions). The ties were the first to go. I stopped wearing them sometime around 2015/2016. At that time, I still wore suits and nice shoes, just no tie. Shortly thereafter, the suits were replaced by sport coats and slacks. These were still tailored, not casual. But then, at some point, everything became more casual. The nice leather shoes were traded in for the new style sneakers that everyone now wears, or Allbirds or some other more casual footwear. These days I may not even wear a sport coat. Vests are a nice option. They’re flexible and nearly always sure to fit in with the prevailing attire of the day. Plus they make me look sporty, or maybe techy. A little more like I get it (even though I probably don’t).

TenantSee Weekly: Tech: Big and Small

TenantSee Weekly: Tech: Big and Small

For decades the San Francisco office market was a unique and seemingly irreplaceable technology hub. The city had so many variables essential to startup tech success that companies believed they had to be here, regardless of the cost. Proximity to Stanford and UC Berkeley, the epicenter of venture capital on Sand Hill Road, the Silicon Valley - - - home to major tech headquarters, including Google, Apple and Facebook and the abundance of bright young tech talent that flocked here from all over the world to be part of the innovation economy. All this in one place. It was a compelling narrative (and true). The city’s beauty and appeal to younger tech workers was obvious. Like New York City was (and remains) for those seeking their fortune in finance, until fairly recently, if tech was your thing, you had to be in San Francisco.

TenantSee Weekly: Let's Exchange Financials

TenantSee Weekly: Let's Exchange Financials

The price of San Francisco office space is mostly falling. Sure, there’s some outlier examples of premier view space where the price is stable, even increasing. But, on balance, we’re talking about a significantly declining market. A silver lining for occupiers who’ve otherwise endured a long period of limited supply and record high costs. Yet while on paper the cost of the market looks better, the effects of the downturn can (and will) render some landlords incapable of effectively running the building. Because most lease negotiations are set up as a sort of “David and Goliath” battle in which the tenant is David and the landlord Goliath, it’s not necessarily common for tenants to ask too many questions about a landlord’s financial position. Yet like the tenant, the landlord has many obligations under the lease, the performance of which require its financial health. Tenants must share their financials and often provide security mechanisms to secure their performance under the lease. This typically comes in the form of a letter of credit or security deposit. The landlord version of security for the tenant would be things like a self-help provision and/or an SNDA. Self-help enables the tenant to solve for issues the landlord is otherwise obligated to solve, but for which it does not have the capital to do so, by paying to have the work done and deducting the cost from Rent. The SNDA, or subordination non-disturbance agreement, is a legal document that protects the terms of the lease in the event a lender takes over building (e.g., the landlord defaults on the loan). These are examples of protective mechanisms against a failing landlord.