#employers

TenantSee Weekly: What Comes Next For Office

TenantSee Weekly: What Comes Next For Office

We’ve noticed an interesting shift in how companies are thinking about their offices.  For some time now, many companies have resolved to employ a hybrid approach to workplace, having employees work in office for a designated number of days each week.  In many cases, this solution was chosen more for how it seemingly struck a compromise between employers who wanted employees in the office and employees who sought freedom to choose.  To date, companies have been relatively lax in enforcing their workplace plan.  What’s changed?   Leadership is now becoming increasingly frustrated at spending on underutilized real estate.  Companies track space usage, and they don’t like what they’re seeing.  The occupancy reality is often way below what it would otherwise be if employees were following the hybrid work policy.  The company leasing 10,000 sf to accommodate an average of 10 workers each day is (painfully) aware of the wasted spend. 

TenantSee Weekly: Knowing Your When

TenantSee Weekly: Knowing Your When

We see a lot of confusion in the market around when to begin negotiations.  It’s not an insignificant consideration.  In fact, when you begin can make a huge difference in the outcome.  It’s understandable that tenants would not know when to start.  Brokers are not always keen to start at the right time, since compensation is derived by transacting and the closer the tenant is to lease expiration, the faster it will need to transact (and the fewer options it will have).  Good for the broker, bad for the tenant.  This creates a misalignment of interests that discourages thoughtful consultation on the front end – the more time a broker spends on a project, the lower the compensation. 

TenantSee Weekly: Reconnecting Work to Place

TenantSee Weekly:  Reconnecting Work to Place

Lately I’ve been contemplating Enrico Morreti’s 2012 book “The New Geography of Jobs”.  In it, Morreti makes the case that urban winners and losers are determined, in large part, based on the extent of geographic concentrations of high-tech employment.  San Francisco was perhaps the most prominent example of the thriving economic ecosystems that can emerge when tech employment is aggregated in one region.  I believe Morreti’s core thesis remains correct.  But his ecosystems are more fragile than we may have anticipated.  In fact, it seems they can unravel in much less time than they took to build. 

TenantSee Weekly: It's About Trust

TenantSee Weekly: It's About Trust

Getting More for Less.

Companies aren’t families.  The employer/employee relationship is governed more by economics (math) than trust.  This is at the heart of the ongoing struggle between employers and employees over return to office and asynchronous work.  Let us explain.

 

TenantSee Weekly: The Lingering Fog of a Bull Market

TenantSee Weekly:  The Lingering Fog of a Bull Market

The Lingering Fog of a Bull Market.
 
Advisors on the right side of a bull market end up looking good, no matter what they do.  This was certainly the case for landlord advisors in the San Francisco office market for the ~10 years leading up to the pandemic, a time when you could win for losing, as the deal you failed to make was often (quickly) replaced by a new deal at better rental economics due to rapidly appreciating rents.  Today, both landlord advisors and the investors they advise are, in some cases, suffering from the lingering effects of the bull market.


TenantSee Weekly: The Disconnected Worker

TenantSee Weekly: The Disconnected Worker

I read an article recently about layoffs in the tech sector.  In it, one worker shared her story of being laid off by 3 companies in less than a year.  The first was a startup where she had worked for several years.  She questioned why she had been selected – it clearly felt personal.  The next 2 employments were each of short duration, the last being merely a month long.  In the end, she was left questioning whether she wanted to continue working in tech.  The tech sector, especially the startup segment of the tech sector, has never been a great place to seek job security because of its inherent volatility.  Yet it has long been a place in which employers seek to espouse winning and attractive cultures that are all about “the people”.  This got me thinking about job security in the post-pandemic workplace.  Has employment in the information economy become more unstable because there is less connection between employer and employee?  Is the relationship between employer and employee becoming more transactional?