I have a lot of suits and ties. The ties are folded neatly in a drawer that I rarely open. Some are solid, some have stripes, some have little animal prints. I also have a lot of suits. These are mostly tucked into the back of my closet. Oh, I have some expensive leather shoes in a variety of styles, as well. These, too, are stored in various states of disuse. I no longer wear this stuff (but for rare exceptions). The ties were the first to go. I stopped wearing them sometime around 2015/2016. At that time, I still wore suits and nice shoes, just no tie. Shortly thereafter, the suits were replaced by sport coats and slacks. These were still tailored, not casual. But then, at some point, everything became more casual. The nice leather shoes were traded in for the new style sneakers that everyone now wears, or Allbirds or some other more casual footwear. These days I may not even wear a sport coat. Vests are a nice option. They’re flexible and nearly always sure to fit in with the prevailing attire of the day. Plus they make me look sporty, or maybe techy. A little more like I get it (even though I probably don’t).
TenantSee Weekly: Tech: Big and Small
For decades the San Francisco office market was a unique and seemingly irreplaceable technology hub. The city had so many variables essential to startup tech success that companies believed they had to be here, regardless of the cost. Proximity to Stanford and UC Berkeley, the epicenter of venture capital on Sand Hill Road, the Silicon Valley - - - home to major tech headquarters, including Google, Apple and Facebook and the abundance of bright young tech talent that flocked here from all over the world to be part of the innovation economy. All this in one place. It was a compelling narrative (and true). The city’s beauty and appeal to younger tech workers was obvious. Like New York City was (and remains) for those seeking their fortune in finance, until fairly recently, if tech was your thing, you had to be in San Francisco.
TenantSee Weekly: Let's Exchange Financials
The price of San Francisco office space is mostly falling. Sure, there’s some outlier examples of premier view space where the price is stable, even increasing. But, on balance, we’re talking about a significantly declining market. A silver lining for occupiers who’ve otherwise endured a long period of limited supply and record high costs. Yet while on paper the cost of the market looks better, the effects of the downturn can (and will) render some landlords incapable of effectively running the building. Because most lease negotiations are set up as a sort of “David and Goliath” battle in which the tenant is David and the landlord Goliath, it’s not necessarily common for tenants to ask too many questions about a landlord’s financial position. Yet like the tenant, the landlord has many obligations under the lease, the performance of which require its financial health. Tenants must share their financials and often provide security mechanisms to secure their performance under the lease. This typically comes in the form of a letter of credit or security deposit. The landlord version of security for the tenant would be things like a self-help provision and/or an SNDA. Self-help enables the tenant to solve for issues the landlord is otherwise obligated to solve, but for which it does not have the capital to do so, by paying to have the work done and deducting the cost from Rent. The SNDA, or subordination non-disturbance agreement, is a legal document that protects the terms of the lease in the event a lender takes over building (e.g., the landlord defaults on the loan). These are examples of protective mechanisms against a failing landlord.
TenantSee Weekly: What's Possible?
When it comes to negotiating with landlords for office space, today the San Francisco market and many like it officially fall in the “…it doesn’t hurt to ask” zone. In this rare market space, occupiers have the luxury of translating their concerns as challenges for landlords to solve, or not. This includes many challenges that stood zero chance of being addressed (or even considered) in the years prior to the pandemic.
TenantSee Weekly: Market Leverage, Mass Psychology and the San Francisco Office Market
In the context of lease negotiations, counter parties seek to leverage market dynamics to maximize their advantage. For office markets, the primary dynamic being leveraged is that of supply/demand. When supply is scarce and demand is strong, the landlord counter party leverages scarcity to increase rents and reduce concessions. Alternatively, when supply is plentiful and demand is low, tenants leverage their options to lower rent and increase concessions. Basic stuff, right? Perhaps more interesting is the mass psychology that evolves around a marketplace which has experienced a prolonged run of one-sided leverage
TenantSee Weekly: Find Your People Then Build Them a Place
Every industry and company has unique labor needs. These needs can be synthesized into target demographic profiles which can be used to evaluate global markets in search of the best places to grow the business. Certainly there is more that goes into where a company elects to establish a presence than just the amount of available talent. Among other factors, companies might consider proximity to key clients, proximity to investors (e.g., venture capital), proximity to educational institutions graduating the target demographic, cost of living, cost of office space, government incentives, even proximity to competitors from whom talent may be poached. Indeed, discovering the best markets is a complex undertaking.
TenantSee Weekly: Why We Write
Why do you get these weekly communications from us? What is TenantSee? We figured it’s time to explain a few things.
Let’s start with the second question first. TenantSee is the name we’ve given to our approach to tenant real estate services. We chose this name because we believe its important for tenants to see more. To see more what, you may ask. To see more of the big picture and the little details that make for better real estate outcomes. To see more of the data and analytics that drive good decision making. To see more transparently, the specific strategies we employ to maximize value. To de-mystify good tenant real estate. For us, the traditional approach to tenant advisory was opaque and failed to get some basic things right, exposing occupiers to an unnecessary knowledge deficit when compared to the landlord counter-party.
TenantSee Weekly: Prop 8 Protection
Prop 8 allows owners to appeal for a temporary reduction in taxes when property values have declined. When granted, the relief is for a period of one year, after which point the owner must reapply. This is a important topic, as given the current state of the San Francisco office market, we anticipate a lot of owners will go to the city seeking relief.
TenantSee Weekly: San Francisco's Demand Problem
The San Francisco office market consists of 86M sf. Currently, 18.7M sf is available, 13.7M direct from landlords and 5M for sublease. This means that 72.3M sf is leased and not being marketed for sublease. We can assume there will not be much (if any) new supply added to the market over the next several years. Demand will be the key factor in determining the market’s trajectory.
Market Outlook QTR2 2022 - Tenant Perspective
This San Francisco office market report is provided compliments of Samantha S. Low and Greg Fogg, Co-Creators of TenantSee. TenantSee is a tenant real estate product combining a team of subject-matter experts with powerful technology to make tenant real estate smarter, faster, and better. Our report is intended to provide you, the tenant, with meaningful insights, not raw data. To learn more about TenantSee,. please visit www.lowfogg.com
TenantSee Weekly: The Restructure
What may not be readily apparent to some occupiers is the extent to which the San Francisco office market presents an opportunity to restructure leases. What does it mean to “restructure” a lease, you may ask. Well, it can mean a lot of different things, but in this case we’re talking about negotiating new terms ahead of an expiration such that the tenant receives immediate benefit. For example, say a lease has 3 years remaining at rents that are significantly above market and the tenant requires improvements to modify the space. If the tenant is willing to commit to the building for a term extension beyond the existing expiration, depending on the circumstances at the asset level, there may be an opportunity to recast the lease. The trade for the landlord is one of near term pain for long term gain. The trade for the tenant is one of near term gain for (potentially) less future gain. In a perfect world scenario, timing would work just right and the tenant would make the trade early, only to see the market turn less favorable thereby making the restructure look genius.
TenantSee Weekly: Where's the Exit
The office lease is a complicated contract. Once executed, but for its expiration, there’s no easy way out. In our experience, companies often give too little consideration to the exit. It’s understandable amidst the excitement of signing a new lease. Thinking about how to unwind the lease before signing it is a bit like sliding a prenup across the table to your future bride a few days before the wedding. But things happen. And things especially happen over a period of years.
TenantSee Weekly: Landlord Strategies, Oppositional Landlords and Leverage: Random Thoughts
Rent, or net operating income, is 100% correlated with value. When an owner lowers the rent, they reduce the value of their building. This is why many investors will do all sorts of things before lowering rent. For example, the most common approach is to provide big allowances and/or large amounts of free rent in exchange for rate preservation. It doesn’t feel great, but since it protects asset value, it’s in chapter one of every institutional owner’s playbook.
TenantSee Weekly: The Space Between...
When it comes to office space, corporate leaders now find themselves stuck in the space between the forced closure of their offices in 2020 and having to conceive new workplace approaches that (somehow) foster productivity, enhance recruitment and retention and (generally) satisfy the diverse (and conflicting) needs of the employees. This is not a comfortable place. Indeed, we’re finding that many corporate leaders are unwilling to take responsibility for conceiving and executing a future workplace strategy. They fear making the wrong decision. Who can blame them? After all, given the extent and pace of change, it seems more likely for future oriented workplace strategies to fail than succeed. Who wants to take on that risk?
TenantSee Weekly: Thoughts on Broker-Led Solutions for the Middle Market
Finding high quality real estate services is easiest when a company is small, solving for one lease or a few leases in a small region; or, when a company is large and looking to hire a global partner that can provide a spectrum of services for managing a complex portfolio. These are the “bookends” of the market where there is the greatest alignment between the structure of the services and the client need. It’s in the middle, companies of 250 – 5,000 employees, where things get challenging. This week, we’ll explore important considerations when searching for a real estate advisor in this middle market.
TenantSee Weekly: Space Disposition Math Exercises in a Declining Market
Who wants to do some fun disposition recovery math?! San Francisco’s office market has been the perfect storm for occupiers looking to dispose of office space. High vacancy and sluggish demand against the backdrop of record high in place rents. While the market is a key variable in determining sublease outcome, it can be a distraction in defining the correct disposition strategy when occupiers focus on current rent values in the market at large. In the declining market, only the values being achieved on comparable sublease offerings serve as a relevant proxy for market, but even then, there is a high degree of fluidity. Why is the sublease offering valued differently than comparable direct space?
TenantSee Weekly: How Remote Work is Changing Small Town Residential Markets
For many years my family has been coming to Vermont for summer vacation. We love the change of scenery from our urban life in San Francisco. Every morning at about 5 am the birds begin singing outside our windows, serving as a natural alarm clock. As they gently nudge you awake with their beautiful songs, the sun begins to rise. Our place is located in a town called Quechee, VT, home to a long running hot air balloon festival. It’s pretty common to hear the gentle hiss of a balloon passing overhead early in the morning. When this happens, it’s such a beautiful sight that we usually jump out of bed and run to the deck to watch. It’s a peaceful experience.
TenantSee Weekly: Ice Cream on a Hot Summer Day
TenantSee Weekly: The Questions
TenantSee Weekly: Who Stole My Narrative
Historically, the narrative within the commercial office markets in big cities has been controlled by institutions. Institutions who own the buildings and institutions who “own” the employees. The markets fluctuated between “tight” or “soft” and leverage shifted back and forth from landlord to tenant. These 2 market participants, landlord and tenant, supply and demand, called the shots. Sure, there were other variables, the economy, other market influences and influencers. But the narrative was defined within a fairly narrow range.



















