Oakland

TenantSee Weekly: Why Institutional Investment Keeps Rents High

TenantSee Weekly: Why Institutional Investment Keeps Rents High

When I began my real estate career in San Francisco in the early 1990s, office buildings were mostly owned by private investors using a relatively small selection of institutional capital partners. The Shorenstein Company, whom I worked for from 1990 – 1995, was a great example. At that time, they were the largest owner of office buildings in San Francisco, holding 11M sf. During those days, most owners, including Shorenstein, employed a simple strategy centered on preserving tenants while minimizing cash requirements (funding of tenant improvements, etc.). In most cases, the first choice was to keep the existing tenant by offering a rental rate which was discounted to market. If that failed and the tenant moved out, the next step was to undercut the market by lowering the rental rate to steal a tenant away from another building. The goal was to buy and manage the asset to generate maximum cash flow, which the investors counted on each quarter. Importantly, the majority of assets were owned by this type of investor. But by the mid-1990s, the nature of office ownership was beginning a period of significant change which would materially impact rental economics for decades to come.

TenantSee Weekly: A Level Playing Field

TenantSee Weekly: A Level Playing Field

This week we’re writing about an old topic that surfaces every now and again, usually when we come across a tenant who has chosen to negotiate a lease or lease renewal on its own. Why would a tenant do so? I think the most common reason is perceived savings. This scenario seems to play out most often in buildings owned by private investors (e.g., not institutions). Buildings where the landlord calls the tenant directly and proposes to renew the lease at a discount if the tenant negotiates without a broker.

TenantSee Weekly: Less Space, More Uncertainty

TenantSee Weekly: Less Space, More Uncertainty

Over the past year our small team based in San Francisco has not worked on a single assignment in which the client is expanding its leased office space. In some cases, the leased footprint remains the same, but many clients are decreasing their leased space. We're doing work all over North America. Client approaches to the office range from the following:

TenantSee Weekly: We're In A Pandemic, Why Is My Rent Increasing?

TenantSee Weekly: We're In A Pandemic, Why Is My Rent Increasing?

This is a common question for tenants looking to negotiate lease extensions in the current market environment. Intuitively, they expect their occupancy cost to decrease due to the effects of the pandemic (e.g., higher vacancy, less demand, etc.). However, they often fail to realize the point of impact, or the base values on which market softness has its affect, are values that were in place just prior to the pandemic, not values from 5+ years ago when they signed the original lease…

TenantSee Weekly: A Short Discussion of Operating Expenses and Taxes (Insert Big Yawn Here)

TenantSee Weekly: A Short Discussion of Operating Expenses and Taxes (Insert Big Yawn Here)

I know. This is painful. But you need to understand it, so here goes. A third or more of a tenant’s occupancy cost is attributed to the operation and taxation of the building in which it leases space. Yet these costs and how they are distributed are often a source of confusion.

TenantSee Weekly: The Math Behind the Motivation

TenantSee Weekly: The Math Behind the Motivation

Occupiers often think pricing for office space is one dimensional. Sure, they understand that different quality buildings and spaces translate to different prices. But pricing is actually complex and dynamic, based on many variables, including specific owner motivations. And motivations vary significantly from one owner to the next.